When to coach vs when to course-correct
What you'll learn
- Coach: capability + sub-optimal choice + recoverable cost.
- Course-correct: high-cost or irreversible + immediate need.
- Default to coaching is malpractice for fires; default to correcting kills coaching surface.
Coach when the IC has the capability but is making sub-optimal choices — your role is to ask questions that help them see what you see. Course-correct when the IC is heading toward a near-term outcome you can't accept — your role is to name the problem directly, name the change you need, and reserve coaching for after.
The mistake new managers make: defaulting to coaching for everything because it feels less confrontational. Coaching a fire is malpractice — the building burns while you Socratic-method the IC.
The mistake experienced managers sometimes make: defaulting to course-correcting because it's faster. The IC stops bringing the early-warning signals because they know each one becomes a directive. You lose the surface area to coach.
A simple test: if the cost of being wrong is small + recoverable, coach. If it's large or irreversible (customer impact, security incident, hire-mistake), course-correct now, coach later in the 1:1.
Key points
- Coach: capability + sub-optimal choice + recoverable cost.
- Course-correct: high-cost or irreversible + immediate need.
- Default to coaching is malpractice for fires; default to correcting kills coaching surface.
Pitfalls
- Socratic-method during a customer-impacting incident.
- Correcting low-stakes calls so often the IC stops bringing them up.
Ask your skip-level
In a real Adept rollout this routes to your company's leadership Claude project; in the demo it opens a fresh Claude chat.